湍流一定需要黏性吗!为什么?!
It is very hard to answer. But you know, without viscotiy, no real eddies. In other words, the visocity is the essential features of turbulence(?I think!). Effects caused by turbulence are embodied by the enhancement of visocity (difficusity).
欧拉方程会得到湍流的解吗?I think no!
数学上,或物理上,湍流究竟是解的不稳定问题,还是不确定问题?!
both of those factors. You know the instablity is believed to be the origin of turbulence, while uncertainty is the essence of turbulence. In fact, turbulence remain open because there are difficulties both on the physical meaning and mathematical analysis of turublence.
欧拉方程会得到湍流的解吗?I think no!
数学上,或物理上,湍流究竟是解的不稳定问题,还是不确定问题?!
both of those factors. You know the instablity is believed to be the origin of turbulence, while uncertainty is the essence of turbulence. In fact, turbulence remain open because there are difficulties both on the physical meaning and mathematical analysis of turublence.
欧拉方程没有湍流解?!前提是我们把湍流解定义为满足物理上湍流特性的解,如DNS的结果要和统计理论的处理的实验结果印证,但欧拉方程作为非线形方程,它的解肯定存在失稳分叉以至混沌的情况(没注意有没有在欧拉方程中加扰动研究稳定性的工作,望告之),欧拉方程缺乏的是耗散机制,但不缺失稳机制。
讨论到这里,偶倒想知道不确定和不稳定的含义了,这是我们继续讨论下去的基础,各位,我觉得我们是在讨论一个非常有意义的open问题,拿出点原创精神,把自己的认识讲出来,希望这是一个精彩的开始!
下面引用由对月在 2004/02/18 10:36am 发表的内容:
欧拉方程会得到湍流的解吗?I think no!
数学上,或物理上,湍流究竟是解的不稳定问题,还是不确定问题?!
both of those factors. You know the instablity is believed to be the origin of turbulence, whi ...